Derek: I agree that your method would work, but I was talking about more native load balancer without rewriting the logics. Henry Huang Unified Communication System R&D, Founder of UniC Solution US: +1 (626) 606-3306 台灣(Taiwan): +886 933847619 Chat Google Talk: red_rain_seven@gmail.com Skype: unicsolution MSN: b_ball_henry@hotmail.com Contact Me [image: Linkedin]<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/henry-huang/1/654/578>[image: Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=595148342>[image: Twitter]<http://twitter.com/unicsolution> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Nyamul Hassan <mnhassan@usa.net> wrote:
Another scenario is, in countries where regular SIP / H323 is blocked, IAX is mostly not so, and therefore helps.
I personally prefer to work with H323 / SIP. But, ground realities are a bit different at times.
Regards HASSAN
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 18:28, Tony Graziano <tgraziano@myitdepartment.net>wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Why is everyone dead set on using IAX? you know SIP works fine and can traverse NAT if you know how to set it up properly.
/b
On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Steven Ayre wrote:
Yuck.
On 7 September 2010 02:56, Jeffrey Leung <curriegrad2004@gmail.com> wrote:
If you do really want to use IAX, there is a solution: Use Asterisk as an IAX protocol translator and have it to forward all the calls via SIP to Freeswitch.
Bad habits are hard to kick.
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org