Derek:

I agree that your method would work, but I was talking about more native load balancer without rewriting the logics.

Henry Huang
Unified Communication System R&D, Founder of UniC Solution
US: +1 (626) 606-3306
台灣(Taiwan): +886 933847619
Chat Google Talk: red_rain_seven@gmail.com Skype: unicsolution MSN: b_ball_henry@hotmail.com
Contact Me LinkedinFacebookTwitter


On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Nyamul Hassan <mnhassan@usa.net> wrote:
Another scenario is, in countries where regular SIP / H323 is blocked, IAX is mostly not so, and therefore helps.

I personally prefer to work with H323 / SIP.  But, ground realities are a bit different at times.

Regards
HASSAN


On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 18:28, Tony Graziano <tgraziano@myitdepartment.net> wrote:


On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Why is everyone dead set on using IAX?  you know SIP works fine and can traverse NAT if you know how to set it up properly.

/b

On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Steven Ayre wrote:

Yuck.

On 7 September 2010 02:56, Jeffrey Leung <curriegrad2004@gmail.com> wrote:
If you do really want to use IAX, there is a solution: Use Asterisk as
an IAX protocol translator and have it to forward all the calls via
SIP to Freeswitch.

Bad habits are hard to kick.




_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org