Hi Michael, shall I file a "bug" against this? Thanks Richard On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:
ilbc2 is the right one, configure checks for both, it is to avoid the name collision. not sure why they would both be there, ilbc probably shouldn't be.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:27 AM Richard Chan <richard@treeboxsolutions.com> wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what the purpose is of having two RPMs for ilbc, named ilbc and ilbc2.
Does the build system check for both? In Fedora (not sure for CentOS) there is an incompatible RPM so perhaps to avoid a package name clash?
-- Richard Chan
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Richard Chan Chief Architect TreeBox Solutions Pte Ltd 1 Commonwealth Lane #03-01 Singapore 149544 Tel: 6570 3725 http://www.treeboxsolutions.com Co.Reg.No. 201100585R