ilbc2 is the right one, configure checks for both, it is to avoid the name collision.  not sure why they would

both be there, ilbc probably shouldn't be.

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:27 AM Richard Chan <richard@treeboxsolutions.com> wrote:

Hi,

I was wondering what the purpose is of having two RPMs for ilbc, named ilbc and ilbc2.

Does the build system check for both? In Fedora (not sure for CentOS)  there is an incompatible RPM so perhaps to avoid a package name clash?

--

Richard Chan

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org