Hi all, I have the following problem: I have an dialplan rule in freeswitch that delegates the control for the incoming call on a specific number to an erlang application. This erlang application, at one point executes a lua script using the call: {api, luarun, "luascript.lua uuid"} In lua I do the following: api = freeswitch.API(); session = freeswitch.session(argv[1]); uuid = session:get_uuid(); if session:ready() then uuid_break_cmd = "uuid_break ".. uuid .. " all"; uuid_hold_cmd = "uuid_hold off" .. uuid; freeswitch.consoleLog("notice","uuid break cmd: ".. uuid_break_cmd .. "\n"); session:execute("break","all"); api:executeString(uuid_break_cmd); reply = api:executeString(uuid_break_cmd); freeswitch.consoleLog("notice", "After uuid_break.\n"); end The thing is that freeswitch ignores completly uuid_break and uuid_hold off The same command issued via fs_cli has effect. In fs_cli on debug I can see this: 2015-02-10 20:23:51.405153 [NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1328 uuid break cmd: uuid_break f36d5e5c-b151-11e4-9674-8f19f7458942 all EXECUTE sofia/ctradu-dev.ezuce.ro/1002@ctradu-dev.ezuce.ro break(all) 2015-02-10 20:23:51.405153 [DEBUG] mod_erlang_event.c:169 Ignoring event CHANNEL_EXECUTE for attached session f36d5e5c-b151-11e4-9674-8f19f7458942 2015-02-10 20:23:51.405153 [DEBUG] mod_erlang_event.c:169 Ignoring event CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE for attached session f36d5e5c-b151-11e4-9674-8f19f7458942 2015-02-10 20:23:51.405153 [NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1328 After uuid_break. Does anyone know why uuid_break has no effect executed from a script launched via api luarun ? (And the same command when issued via fs_cli has effect) The freeswitch version is 1.4.15~64bit Thank you, Costin