I have the following problem:

I have an dialplan rule in freeswitch that delegates the control for the incoming call on a specific number to an erlang application.

This erlang application, at one point executes a lua script using the call:

{api, luarun, "luascript.lua uuid"}

In lua I do the following:

api = freeswitch.API();

session = freeswitch.session(argv[1]);

uuid = session:get_uuid();

if session:ready() then
   uuid_break_cmd = "uuid_break ".. uuid .. " all";
   uuid_hold_cmd  = "uuid_hold off" .. uuid;
   freeswitch.consoleLog("notice","uuid break cmd: ".. uuid_break_cmd .. "\n");
   session:execute("break","all");
   api:executeString(uuid_break_cmd);
   reply = api:executeString(uuid_break_cmd);

   freeswitch.consoleLog("notice", "After uuid_break.\n");
end

The thing is that freeswitch ignores completly uuid_break and uuid_hold off

The same command issued via fs_cli has effect.

In fs_cli on debug I can see this:
2015-02-10 20:23:51.405153 [NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1328 uuid break cmd: uuid_break f36d5e5c-b151-11e4-9674-8f19f7458942 all
EXECUTE sofia/ctradu-dev.ezuce.ro/1002@ctradu-dev.ezuce.ro break(all)
2015-02-10 20:23:51.405153 [DEBUG] mod_erlang_event.c:169 Ignoring event CHANNEL_EXECUTE for attached session f36d5e5c-b151-11e4-9674-8f19f7458942
2015-02-10 20:23:51.405153 [DEBUG] mod_erlang_event.c:169 Ignoring event CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE for attached session f36d5e5c-b151-11e4-9674-8f19f7458942
2015-02-10 20:23:51.405153 [NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1328 After uuid_break.

Does anyone know why uuid_break has no effect executed from a script launched via api luarun ?

(And the same command when issued via fs_cli has effect)

The freeswitch version is 1.4.15~64bit

Thank you,
Costin