Right we can't do it Its difficult to add On Feb 14, 2010 11:39 AM, "Victor Maruani" <vmaruani@interwise.com> wrote: Hi, I understand your point and the reason I want to bypass media has a lot to do with load/call volume. I don't mind the notify series being implemented or not, the notify OK is enough if it succeeded indeed. I think the issue here is the order of action. Instead of making a long speech and lose my point allow me to put it like this: What I see today is: a- REFER is received b- FS immediately sends 202 accepted ----- ok c- FS sends NOTIFY OK to B ---- wrong (not true yet) d- FS sends reINVITE to A ------ wrong (why not after FS gets C's sdp) e- B is disconnected ------- wrong (same as above , and if C is down I lose the caller) f- FS INVITE C ------ ok Without getting in sip madness, I would change the order to a,b, F , c,d,e This way only do I have the sofia leg talking to the B-leg independently during the REFER in my view. What do you think? In the meantime I'll try playing with the config but so far I don't have it work. Thanks, Regards, Victor. *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Anthony Minessale *Sent:* Sunday, February 14, 2010 4:54 PM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Bypass-media and REFER method We don't support the series of 100,180,200 in the notifies that is typically a pure sip pbx fea... _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org