Right we can't do it
Its difficult to add
On Feb 14, 2010 11:39 AM, "Victor Maruani" <vmaruani@interwise.com> wrote:
Hi,
I understand your point and the reason I want to bypass media has a lot to do with load/call volume.
I don't mind the notify series being implemented or not, the notify OK is enough if it succeeded indeed.
I think the issue here is the order of action.
Instead of making a long speech and lose my point allow me to put it like this:
What I see today is:
a- REFER is received
b- FS immediately sends 202 accepted ----- ok
c- FS sends NOTIFY OK to B ---- wrong (not true yet)
d- FS sends reINVITE to A ------ wrong (why not after FS gets C's sdp)
e- B is disconnected ------- wrong (same as above , and if C is down I lose the caller)
f- FS INVITE C ------ ok
Without getting in sip madness, I would change the order to a,b, F , c,d,e
This way only do I have the sofia leg talking to the B-leg independently during the REFER in my view.
What do you think?
In the meantime I'll try playing with the config but so far I don't have it work.
Thanks,
Regards,
Victor.
From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 4:54 PMSubject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Bypass-media and REFER method
We don't support the series of 100,180,200 in the notifies that is typically a pure sip pbx fea...
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org