9 Jul
2012
9 Jul
'12
6:56 p.m.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Gabriel Gunderson <gabe@gundy.org> wrote:
Given how it works, they should have named it FauxBochs.
No, it wasn't meant to be critical of the product; I've never used it. Rather, it was commentary on how they're faking faxs. " It appears to handle the analog fax machine locally, then send the fax as a data TCP connection to the server (as a TIFF or JPG I would guess)." Faux: Not genuine; fake or false... "her faux New York accent". Anything that kills real fax is okay by me. Nothing more :) Gabe