I would say that the parking meter is a good idea and it is the default behavior of parking on legacy PBXs. Since we always do _more_, what do you think about having the option to transfer to any extension instead of just the one that transfered the call? Regards, jm On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:20 PM, <Russell.Mosemann@cune.org> wrote:
Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> said:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:18 PM, mayamatakeshi <mayamatakeshi@gmail.com>wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Michael Collins
<msc@freeswitch.org>wrote:
FYI,
The FreeSWITCH devs have added valet parking! Check it out: http://www.freeswitch.org/node/207
Let us know what you think.
Very nice.
But I think a valet_unpark app is missing. If the intention of the person sent to the valet lot is to retrieve a
call
there, the person can assume the call was already retrieved by someone else or that the caller hung up if he/she hears MOH. But it would be nicer to have a valet_unpark app to fail and let the dialplan play a message.
I understand what you are saying. I'm not sure I agree, but we'll kick the idea around when we have a few minutes and let you know what we decide. -MC
If you do decide to implement something, I would encourage that it be flexible so that when the parking meter runs out :-), it could either play a message or forward the call to an extension (default to the extension that parked it).
-- Russell Mosemann
________________________________________________________ Concordia University, Nebraska See http://www.cune.edu/ for the latest news and events!
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org