I would say that the parking meter is a good idea and it is the default behavior of parking on legacy PBXs. Since we always do _more_, what do you think about having the option to transfer to any extension instead of just the one that transfered the call?
Regards,
jm
If you do decide to implement something, I would encourage that it beMichael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> said:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:18 PM, mayamatakeshi
<mayamatakeshi@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Michael Collins
<msc@freeswitch.org>wrote:
> >
> >> FYI,
> >>
> >> The FreeSWITCH devs have added valet parking! Check it out:
> >> http://www.freeswitch.org/node/207
> >>
> >> Let us know what you think.
> >>
> >
> > Very nice.
> >
> > But I think a valet_unpark app is missing.
> > If the intention of the person sent to the valet lot is to retrieve a
call
> > there, the person can assume the call was already retrieved by
someone else
> > or that the caller hung up if he/she hears MOH. But it would be nicer to
> > have a valet_unpark app to fail and let the dialplan play a message.
> >
> > I understand what you are saying. I'm not sure I agree, but we'll
kick the
> idea around when we have a few minutes and let you know what we decide.
> -MC
flexible so that when the parking meter runs out :-), it could either
play a message or forward the call to an extension (default to the
extension that parked it).
--
Russell Mosemann
________________________________________________________
Concordia University, Nebraska
See http://www.cune.edu/ for the latest news and events!
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org