The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the latest source code
That would seem like a reasonable thing to do.....
In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling parallel 30 number?
In my (limited) experience there are two important things to control: 1) call per second 2) Total number of active sessions Calls per seconds appears (to me) to have a greater effect on the CPU. So at 1 call per second I would be looking at your CPU utilization and if it is maxing out then reducing that rate. My point being here that your box *may* be capable of handling 100 or 1000 sessions, if the cps is lowered. HTH On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Durmuş Ali Öztürk <ali.stgt@gmail.com>wrote:
The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the latest source code?
In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling parallel 30 number? -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possibl... Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org