>> The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the latest source
code

That would seem like a reasonable thing to do.....

>> In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling parallel
30 number?
 
In my (limited) experience there are two important things to control:

1) call per second
2) Total number of active sessions

Calls per seconds appears (to me) to have a greater effect on the CPU. So at 1 call per second I would be looking at your CPU utilization and if it is maxing out then reducing that rate.

My point being here that your box *may* be capable of handling 100 or 1000 sessions, if the cps is lowered.

HTH

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Durmuş Ali Öztürk <ali.stgt@gmail.com> wrote:

The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the latest source
code?

In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling parallel
30 number?
--
View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5340996.html
Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org