So this should be safe if you use SIP Session timers ?? ( re-invite every X min ) Jay On 7 March 2014 13:21, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
None, Unless you are happy to block till you receive a packet. So if something happens and you never receive any packets you'll sit there happily waiting for them. -- Brian West brian@freeswitch.org FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC PO BOX 2531 Brookfield, WI 53008-2531 Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest http://www.freeswitchbook.com http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com
T: +1.918.420.9001 | F: +1.918.420.9002 | M: +1.918.424.WEST iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9001 ISN: 410*543 Skype:briankwest PGP Key: http://www.bkw.org/key.txt (AB93356707C76CED)
On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:06 PM, George Halpert <george@thesoniccloud.com> wrote:
Hi,
What are the disadvantages and risks of setting rtp-timer-name to none? What problems can it lead to?
Thanks, George
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Sincerely Jay