So this should be safe if you use SIP Session timers  ?? 
( re-invite every X min )

Jay


On 7 March 2014 13:21, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
None, Unless you are happy to block till you receive a packet.  So if something happens and you never receive any packets you’ll sit there happily waiting for them.
--
Brian West
brian@freeswitch.org
FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC
PO BOX 2531
Brookfield, WI 53008-2531
Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest
http://www.freeswitchbook.com
http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com

T: +1.918.420.9001  |  F: +1.918.420.9002  |  M: +1.918.424.WEST
iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9001
ISN: 410*543
Skype:briankwest
PGP Key: http://www.bkw.org/key.txt (AB93356707C76CED)













On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:06 PM, George Halpert <george@thesoniccloud.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What are the disadvantages and risks of setting rtp-timer-name to none? What problems can it lead to?
>
> Thanks,
> George


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting@freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
http://www.cudatel.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://wiki.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Sincerely

Jay