[Freeswitch-users] performance between bridged call and conference

[David Ponzone]

Seven,

is that on a regular workstation Mac or on a XServe.
If the limitation is still there on a XServe, that's insane!

David Ponzone  Direction Technique
email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr
tel:      01 74 03 18 97
gsm:   06 66 98 76 34

Service Client IPeva
tel:      0811 46 26 26
www.ipeva.fr  -   www.ipeva-studio.com

Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis  
à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou  
diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est  
susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre  
de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes  
pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et  
d'avertir l'expéditeur.




Le 24/08/2010 à 02:00, Seven Du a écrit :

> Thanks Anthony & Brian. I learned more than the limits of my box in
> this thread :). Hard to believe it is hard coded. I did google on this
> subject but got no answer before changed my test case to generate less
> threads.
>
> Even harder to believe it still has this limit on a 12 core. So, I
> guess no one is running (or will run) in production on Mac. But Mac is
> a good platform for developers and we still can do fancy things on it
> like fscomm that's why FS support Mac isn't it?
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org>  
> wrote:
>> Sad part is that 2560 thread limit on OS X is still there... and  
>> they sell a freakin 12 core Mac Pro now..  I have a bug open on  
>> apples bug tracker over this issue for like two years now.
>>
>> /b
>>
>> On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
>>
>>> Mac indeed has some unfair hard-coded 2500 thread limit that we  
>>> can't
>>> explain, we've seen it all along.
>>>
>>> Don't trust the load avg on linux when you have lots of rtp, it's  
>>> not
>>> real its thrown off because of all the rtp traffic causing scheduler
>>> wait.
>>>
>>> anyway, you learned the limits of your box for yourself, good job!
>>> That's what I like to see.
>>>
>>> naturally, you get better or worse results depending on how many cpu
>>> you have or how fast each one is.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com
> Proj:  http://www.freeswitch.org.cn
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100824/557c0f3b/attachment.html