[Freeswitch-users] performance between bridged call and conference

Seven Du dujinfang at gmail.com
Mon Aug 23 18:54:34 PDT 2010


It was a Mac book pro.

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:12 AM, David Ponzone <david.ponzone at ipeva.fr> wrote:
> Seven,
> is that on a regular workstation Mac or on a XServe.
> If the limitation is still there on a XServe, that's insane!
> David Ponzone  Direction Technique
> email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr
> tel:      01 74 03 18 97
> gsm:   06 66 98 76 34
> Service Client IPeva
> tel:      0811 46 26 26
> www.ipeva.fr  -   www.ipeva-studio.com
> Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à
> l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion
> non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible
> d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il
> a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce
> message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.
>
>
>
> Le 24/08/2010 à 02:00, Seven Du a écrit :
>
> Thanks Anthony & Brian. I learned more than the limits of my box in
> this thread :). Hard to believe it is hard coded. I did google on this
> subject but got no answer before changed my test case to generate less
> threads.
>
> Even harder to believe it still has this limit on a 12 core. So, I
> guess no one is running (or will run) in production on Mac. But Mac is
> a good platform for developers and we still can do fancy things on it
> like fscomm that's why FS support Mac isn't it?
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:
>
> Sad part is that 2560 thread limit on OS X is still there... and they sell a
> freakin 12 core Mac Pro now..  I have a bug open on apples bug tracker over
> this issue for like two years now.
>
> /b
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
>
> Mac indeed has some unfair hard-coded 2500 thread limit that we can't
>
> explain, we've seen it all along.
>
> Don't trust the load avg on linux when you have lots of rtp, it's not
>
> real its thrown off because of all the rtp traffic causing scheduler
>
> wait.
>
> anyway, you learned the limits of your box for yourself, good job!
>
> That's what I like to see.
>
> naturally, you get better or worse results depending on how many cpu
>
> you have or how fast each one is.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com
> Proj:  http://www.freeswitch.org.cn
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>



-- 
Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com
Proj:  http://www.freeswitch.org.cn



More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list