[Freeswitch-users] performance between bridged call and conference

Seven Du dujinfang at gmail.com
Mon Aug 23 17:00:54 PDT 2010


Thanks Anthony & Brian. I learned more than the limits of my box in
this thread :). Hard to believe it is hard coded. I did google on this
subject but got no answer before changed my test case to generate less
threads.

Even harder to believe it still has this limit on a 12 core. So, I
guess no one is running (or will run) in production on Mac. But Mac is
a good platform for developers and we still can do fancy things on it
like fscomm that's why FS support Mac isn't it?

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org> wrote:
> Sad part is that 2560 thread limit on OS X is still there... and they sell a freakin 12 core Mac Pro now..  I have a bug open on apples bug tracker over this issue for like two years now.
>
> /b
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
>
>> Mac indeed has some unfair hard-coded 2500 thread limit that we can't
>> explain, we've seen it all along.
>>
>> Don't trust the load avg on linux when you have lots of rtp, it's not
>> real its thrown off because of all the rtp traffic causing scheduler
>> wait.
>>
>> anyway, you learned the limits of your box for yourself, good job!
>> That's what I like to see.
>>
>> naturally, you get better or worse results depending on how many cpu
>> you have or how fast each one is.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Blog: http://www.dujinfang.com
Proj:  http://www.freeswitch.org.cn



More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list