[Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH under the Linux 2.6.29 kernel
Paweł Pierścionek
pawel at voiceworks.pl
Mon Apr 27 04:46:20 PDT 2009
boot Your kernel with "divider=10 nohz=off" options :)
Recent kernels are tickless which basically causes all freeswitch
timers/sleeps to fire at requested microsecond intervals.
With nohz kernels You get hundred times more system calls with
freeswitch :(
On 2009-04-27, at 03:00, Jason White wrote:
> After upgrading to the 2.6.29 kernel (the Debian packaged version),
> FreeSWITCH
> takes up more CPU time than usual, e.g., 7% as reported by top, and
> the load
> average is high (e.g., 0.87) even when the machine is idle and there
> are no
> calls in progress. When top is run, FreeSWITCH appears at the start
> of the
> list.
>
> Is anybody else seeing this? The proportion of CPU time devoted to
> system
> calls seems higher than it should be.
>
> I would be interested in reports from anyone else who is running
> FreeSWITCH
> under Linux 2.6.29.1 or equivalent from a distribution.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090427/0f0ec70b/attachment-0002.html
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list