<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">boot Your kernel with "divider=10 <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial; font-size: 13px; ">nohz=off" </span>options :)<div><br></div><div>Recent kernels are tickless which basically causes all freeswitch timers/sleeps to fire at requested microsecond intervals.</div><div>With nohz kernels You get hundred times more system calls with freeswitch :( <br><div><br><div><div>On 2009-04-27, at 03:00, Jason White wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>After upgrading to the 2.6.29 kernel (the Debian packaged version), FreeSWITCH<br>takes up more CPU time than usual, e.g., 7% as reported by top, and the load<br>average is high (e.g., 0.87) even when the machine is idle and there are no<br>calls in progress. When top is run, FreeSWITCH appears at the start of the<br>list.<br><br>Is anybody else seeing this? The proportion of CPU time devoted to system<br>calls seems higher than it should be.<br><br>I would be interested in reports from anyone else who is running FreeSWITCH<br>under Linux 2.6.29.1 or equivalent from a distribution.<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Freeswitch-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org">Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users<br>UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users<br>http://www.freeswitch.org<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>