[Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?

Michael Jerris mike at jerris.com
Tue Dec 9 08:10:06 PST 2008


On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Jan Kubr wrote:

>> btw you can send
>>
>> call-command: hangup
>> hangup-cause: normal_clearing
>>
>> in place of
>> call-command: execute
>> execute-app-name: hangup
>> execute-app-arg: normal_clearing
>
> What is the difference this makes? Just curious because I've been
> using the latter as well.
>
>
>> we just tested you changes and it works the opposite way it should.
>>
>> this means: when we do not send an uuid, we get an an error
>> (Reply-Text => -ERR invalid session id []). if we send a wrong/not
>> existing uuid, the command will be executed on the inbound uuid.
>
> This hasn't been changed, has it? On the latest trunk, if I don't pass
> the uuid, I get "-ERR invalid session id". I can always pass it
> explicitly though, so no big deal.
>
>
> Jan Kubr

We did have confirmation from others that this is working properly  
now.  Can you please make sure you are on current trunk and re-test  
this.

Mike





More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list