[Freeswitch-users] Two major flaws: Could they be fixed?
Jan Kubr
jan.kubr at gmail.com
Tue Dec 9 03:52:24 PST 2008
> btw you can send
>
> call-command: hangup
> hangup-cause: normal_clearing
>
> in place of
> call-command: execute
> execute-app-name: hangup
> execute-app-arg: normal_clearing
What is the difference this makes? Just curious because I've been
using the latter as well.
> we just tested you changes and it works the opposite way it should.
>
> this means: when we do not send an uuid, we get an an error
> (Reply-Text => -ERR invalid session id []). if we send a wrong/not
> existing uuid, the command will be executed on the inbound uuid.
This hasn't been changed, has it? On the latest trunk, if I don't pass
the uuid, I get "-ERR invalid session id". I can always pass it
explicitly though, so no big deal.
Jan Kubr
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list