[Freeswitch-dev] Bridge dialplan to sipx IVR services problem

Anthony Minessale anthony.minessale at gmail.com
Wed Oct 20 08:07:53 PDT 2010

I don't quite get what you are saying but..
Can't you define credentials in FS as noreg gateway and match it up to
the challenge realm?

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Joegen E. Baclor
<joegen at opensipstack.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> Following Anthonys advise to configure a bridged dial plan infront of
> sipX socket based apps proves to be a reasonable approach to let
> attended transfer work for our apps.  However, bridged dial plans for
> the auto-attendant has a side effect.  sipX uses blind transfer to
> forward a caller to its intended destination.  sipX proxy would then
> authenticate the user  if it has proper permission to reach the resource
> as it receives to new INVITE as a result of the blind transfer.  Since
> the call is bridged, b-leg will consume the REFER and send its own
> INVITE which doesn't have the notion how to authenticate against sipX.
> My question is is there a way to propagate the REFER to the caller
> instead of being consumed by the bridge?
> Thanks for any advise in advance.
> Joegen
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
> http://www.freeswitch.org

Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org

More information about the FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list