[Freeswitch-dev] JavaScript - how bad is it?

[João Mesquita]

I believe it has to do with how the language is constructed. Lua is built to
be very lightweight.

Last time I checked, spidermonkey had some problems with delays on some very
specific cases due to its inner workings, but I can't tell for sure.

Will you share your ccxml/vxml integration? I believe that these 2
components are something that lots of ppl could use.


JM


On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jan Berger <jan.berger at video24.no> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>
> I know from a previous postings/discussions that the Javascript we use is
> considered to be bad – performance and memory wise. Can someone explain a
> little – who did the Javascript integration?
>
>
>
> The reason I ask is because I am working on ccxml and vxml – and I need to
> add ECMAScript due to compatibility with external tools/libraries
>
> .
>
> The impression I get from wiki is that Lua perform 2 x the speed of
> JavaScript – does anyone know exactly why?
>
>
>
> Jan
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/attachments/20100605/23dd4a89/attachment.html