jmesquita at freeswitch.org
Sat Jun 5 07:43:54 PDT 2010
I believe it has to do with how the language is constructed. Lua is built to
be very lightweight.
Last time I checked, spidermonkey had some problems with delays on some very
specific cases due to its inner workings, but I can't tell for sure.
Will you share your ccxml/vxml integration? I believe that these 2
components are something that lots of ppl could use.
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jan Berger <jan.berger at video24.no> wrote:
> considered to be bad – performance and memory wise. Can someone explain a
> The reason I ask is because I am working on ccxml and vxml – and I need to
> add ECMAScript due to compatibility with external tools/libraries
> The impression I get from wiki is that Lua perform 2 x the speed of
> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the FreeSWITCH-dev