[Freeswitch-dev] JavaScript - how bad is it?

[Jan Berger]

Yes it’s for open source, but it’s a few hours away yet before I can use it
for anything real.

 

Jan

 

  _____  

From: freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of João
Mesquita
Sent: 5. juni 2010 16:44
To: freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] JavaScript - how bad is it?

 

I believe it has to do with how the language is constructed. Lua is built to
be very lightweight.

 

Last time I checked, spidermonkey had some problems with delays on some very
specific cases due to its inner workings, but I can't tell for sure.

 

Will you share your ccxml/vxml integration? I believe that these 2
components are something that lots of ppl could use.

 


JM



On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jan Berger <jan.berger at video24.no> wrote:

Hi,

 

I know from a previous postings/discussions that the Javascript we use is
considered to be bad – performance and memory wise. Can someone explain a
little – who did the Javascript integration?

 

The reason I ask is because I am working on ccxml and vxml – and I need to
add ECMAScript due to compatibility with external tools/libraries

. 

The impression I get from wiki is that Lua perform 2 x the speed of
JavaScript – does anyone know exactly why? 

 

Jan


_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/attachments/20100605/31271254/attachment-0001.html