[Freeswitch-dev] Linux or Windows?
comments at freecle.com
comments at freecle.com
Mon Nov 5 14:12:12 EST 2007
Comments and questions:
1. I tried to compile with VC++ Express 2008, and got so many errors I
have not figured it out yet.
2. The Trixswitch ico worked great right off ... much better than
Trixbox, which seemed to required a Microsoft-style activation code and
contact with the home office via internet before it would work.
3. I am a hazy about the programming interface to Freeswitch ... is there
a tcp or udp socket to which I can just send commands?
4. Also, it seems like trixswitch does not have the source code for
freeswitch in the ico... is that true?
5. I would like to get a few hours of Anthony's time to film a code
walkthrough that could be posted on the website.
Thanks
Edward
Seattle
> Another consideration is that since our code is cross-platform, it has to
> have an abstraction layer to normalize some bits of code to be platform
> agnostic.
> One major issue with this is that oftentimes, when a function that is
> commonly used
> in UNIX is missing in windows, a poor substitute is written to fill in the
> void.
> This can lead to assumptions that it's robust when it isn't in the case of
> things
> like precision timing (many gettimeofday emulator functions are completely
> inaccurate
> and give the impression that the windows is not as good). We do our best
> to make
> sure we have it working on all platforms but to really succeed, we need
> the help of
> many people who regularly use each platform to test and provide feedback
> about their
> favorite platform. For a high scale operation any variant of UNIX will be
> a better choice than windows from at least a cost standpoint since the
> version of windows that can take advantage of several CPUs is much more
> expensive than the regular version of windows and also if you plan to do
> any development, the free version of the compiler is not really so great
> so you will end up having to buy the MSVC 2008 as well.
>
> The most common used platform during core development is currently rhel4
> iirc which is more or less the same as centos4 the only reason for that
> choice is the particular dual-cpu box with onboard RAID I do my dev on
> only worked for RHEL due to silly binary drivers where something claims
> they support linux and only gives you a redhat rpm (but that's another
> rant). Nonetheless, we move around and test the code on all platforms we
> support, *but*, linux currently still receives the most total hours of dev
> time to date.
>
> We do have many Windows users, so maybe they could chime in about how the
> Win32 experience is going for them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anthony Minessale II
>
> FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
> ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
>
> AIM: anthm
> MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
> GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
> IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
>
> FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
> sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
> iax:guest at conference.freeswitch.org/888
> googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
> pstn:213-799-1400
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Ian Gregson <contact at iangregson.com>
> To: freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
> Sent: Saturday, November 3, 2007 11:41:05 AM
> Subject: [Freeswitch-dev] Linux or Windows?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <!--
> _filtered {font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
> _filtered {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
> /* Style Definitions */
> p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
> {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",
> "sans-serif";}
> a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
> {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
> a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
> {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
> span.EmailStyle17
> {font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:windowtext;}
> .MsoChpDefault
> {}
> _filtered {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
> div.Section1
> {}
> -->
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi there,
>
>
>
>
>
> I was wondering if anyone can offer any info with regards to
> go linux or windows.
>
>
>
>
>
>>From what i gather the freeswitch works on both ... so
> obious linux is free (opensuse i was thinking of.. maybe something
> better?)
>
>
>
>
>
> But what about hardware support, i presume windows would
> have better hardware support?
>
>
>
>
>
> Any info would be gratefully appreciated
>
>
>
>
>
> Ian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-dev mailing list
> Freeswitch-dev at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
More information about the Freeswitch-dev
mailing list