[Freeswitch-users] AWS Instance Recommendations

Marcel Haldemann marcel.haldemann at convercom.ch
Wed Feb 22 11:43:28 MSK 2017


Hi,

Just my 2 Cents to the Topic:

>From my experience FreeSwitch with Audio runs best on VMWare VMs with Intel Xeon CPUs.
A Provider running VMWare only with Intel (as theyr cloud Hyper-Visor) is 1and1.com (or 1und1.de if u'r in Germany or Austria).
https://www.1and1.com/dynamic-cloud-server

for sure u could also use dedicated Servers, preffer Intel Xeons:
https://www.1and1.com/server-dedicated-tariff

A comparable Test-Result with this provider would be interesting using u'r Testsoftware...

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] Im Auftrag von Stanislav Sinyagin
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Februar 2017 08:41
An: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] AWS Instance Recommendations

the overall performance has never been an issue in virtualized installations. It's the stability that is an issue, because of noisy neighbors. Sometimes you just don't get enough CPU cycles to send your RTP packet on-time.

I've done some tests with the help of Sevana Aqua software that compares the recorded audio with original, and with 10-20 parallel calls, very often I got some distortions in one or more calls. I tried several Xen and KVM hosting providers, including DigitalOcean and Linode. I don't think AWS is different in any sense.

Also I had my small PBX on a Xen virtual machine, and later moved it to a hosted dedicated ARM (scaleway.com), and the voice quality has become significantly more clear and stable, even that the geographical distance is about 600km longer.

So, if you have the possibility not to process your RTP media on a virtual machine, don't do this :)








On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Oleg Stolyar <olegstolyar at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, sent accidentally.
>
> I don't see why c4 should not work as well but if you are transcoding, 
> OPUS takes 2-3 times the CPU of other codecs.  Here is a test I did 
> and sent to this list a while back in case it helps.
>
> AWS M3.2xl instance with 8 CPUs for a 10 person conference with all 
> clients connecting from Chrome via WebRTC.
> FS CPU usage was jumping more or less within these ranges throughout 
> the
> conference:
>
> PCMU: 4.3% - 5.0%
> 722: 7.6% - 8.3%
> OPUS: 25% - 50%
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Oleg Stolyar <olegstolyar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't see why c4 should not work as well but if you are 
>> transcoding, OPUS takes 2-3 times the CPU of
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Colin Morelli 
>> <colin.morelli at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info, Oleg.
>>>
>>> Do you know what AMI you're running? Kernel version? Etc. We opted 
>>> for the c4s out of an assumption that our configuration would lend 
>>> itself to being more CPU hungry than memory hungry (we're using 
>>> opus)
>>>
>>> Colin
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Oleg Stolyar 
>>> <olegstolyar at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have been running FS on m3.2xlarge instances for a long time 
>>>> without issues.
>>>>
>>>> With a mix of G.722 and G.711 it handles up to 250-300 concurrent 
>>>> calls/conferences with transcoding although we try to not let it go 
>>>> above 200.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Colin Morelli 
>>>> <colin.morelli at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Stanislav,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry about that - I hadn't seen your reply! Understood on your 
>>>>> suggestions. I guess my ultimate question is - is virtualization 
>>>>> still a huge problem aside from noisy neighbors? AWS of course 
>>>>> allows you to get dedicated instances (albeit expensive), but you're still running in a VM.
>>>>>
>>>>> The complexity of including another data center in the 
>>>>> infrastructure is a bit too much for this use case, but as 
>>>>> mentioned - it'll definitely move this way over time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Joel,
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing other than what's on this thread. However, I will say that 
>>>>> I moved from Ubuntu to an Amazon Linux AMI, moved logging from 
>>>>> direct to disk out to syslog (with async writes to disk), and 
>>>>> increased the instance size to a c4.xlarge, and users are reporting considerable improvements.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Colin
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:01 PM Joel Serrano <joel at gogii.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Colin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you get any more info on FS on AWS? I'm interested on this also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Joel.
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Colin Morelli 
>>>>>> <colin.morelli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey list,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll start by saying I have read the warnings and 
>>>>>>> recommendations to not run FS on virtualized hardware. For right 
>>>>>>> now, though, it's really the only option for me. I don't 
>>>>>>> anticipate nor will I expect the behavior to be the same as what 
>>>>>>> I would get on physical hosts, but would just like it to be as consistent (and good) as possible given the constraints.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My question is - does anyone have particular kernel and instance 
>>>>>>> type recommendations for AWS? I'm getting relatively frequent 
>>>>>>> jitter and what seem like timing-related issues on calls, even 
>>>>>>> in simple device <-> device calls within FS (no external gateway 
>>>>>>> involved). I'm currently running FS in a Debian 8 docker 
>>>>>>> container (with no memory or CPU limits) on a c4.large Ubuntu 
>>>>>>> 16.04 host (kernel 4.4.0-45, default 250hz timer). The 
>>>>>>> particular behavior I'm seeing feels and sounds like a few 
>>>>>>> frames of silence, followed up by the audio being sped up 
>>>>>>> slightly for a second or two (almost like it's trying to catch 
>>>>>>> up), happening occasionally throughout calls. Note that this is 
>>>>>>> with one call, and ~5% CPU usage on the host. Thus I'm pointing a finger most likely at kernel timer resolution. Running time_test 100 on FS returns an average of 200, which seems pretty bad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've heard people have better success with the Amazon Linux AMIs 
>>>>>>> for their packaged kernels. Is this true? Would recompiling the 
>>>>>>> kernel with a 1000hz timer help a lot here?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you're having success on AWS, would be great to know what AMI 
>>>>>>> you're based off of, what kernel version (and timer), and instance size.
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Colin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> _________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>>>>>>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>>>>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswit
>>>>>>> ch-users
>>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> ________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>>>>>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>>>>>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>>>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitc
>>>>>> h-users
>>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>>>> _______ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>>>>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>>>>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>>>>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>>>>
>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>>>
>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch
>>>>> -users
>>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>> ______ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>>>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>>>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>>>
>>>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>>>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>>>
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-
>>>> users
>>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>> _____ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>>
>>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>>
>>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-u
>>> sers
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ___ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-use
> rs
> http://www.freeswitch.org

_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: 
consulting at freeswitch.org
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org



Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list