[Freeswitch-users] Codec transcoding verto - provider

Russell Treleaven rtreleaven at bunnykick.ca
Fri May 13 18:56:13 MSD 2016

Transcoding is computationally expensive and the upper bound for quality is
ulaw because you are using ulaw on at least one leg.
However opus is much better at mitigating the effects of packet loss.
Test with ulaw and if packet loss is a problem then try opus.


On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Gregor Nanger <gregor at infomedia.si> wrote:

> I would please you for opinion.
> If verto client use OPUS to freeswitch and then call is bridged to
> provider that use ulaw, than transcode happens.
> Regarding performance, what do you think, should we also force verto
> client to use ulaw, so there is no transcoding? But I think OPUS is more
> reliable for transportation and quality?
> Best regards, Gregor
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20160513/bb061204/attachment-0001.html 

Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list