<div dir="ltr">Transcoding is computationally expensive and the upper bound for quality is ulaw because you are using ulaw on at least one leg.<div>However opus is much better at mitigating the effects of packet loss.</div><div>Test with ulaw and if packet loss is a problem then try opus.</div><div><br></div><div>Russell</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Gregor Nanger <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:gregor@infomedia.si" target="_blank">gregor@infomedia.si</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">I would please you for opinion.</div><div style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><br></div><div style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">If verto client use OPUS to freeswitch and then call is bridged to provider that use ulaw, than transcode happens.</div><div style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><br></div><div style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">Regarding performance, what do you think, should we also force verto client to use ulaw, so there is no transcoding? But I think OPUS is more reliable for transportation and quality?</div><div style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><br></div><div style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">Best regards, Gregor</div><div></div>
<img src="http://t.sidekickopen51.com/e1t/o/5/f18dQhb0S7ks8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9gXrN7sKj6v5dbp0W3MPnzY4XrbSMW8q-f_43LvrVvW59BB4r1k1H6H0?si=5036397111279616&amp;pi=11e51e28-929c-4447-bb2c-ea811132cbc4" style="display:none!important" height="1" width="1"></div>
<br>_________________________________________________________________________<br>
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:<br>
<a href="mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org">consulting@freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com</a><br>
<br>
Official FreeSWITCH Sites<br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://confluence.freeswitch.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://confluence.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.cluecon.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.cluecon.com</a><br>
<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>