[Freeswitch-users] Running on port 443, pros and cons...

[Michael Nielsen]

I'm running sip with TLS and Srtp.
But I guess you are right with the rtp ports :(

On Wednesday, October 28, 2015, Volodymyr Fedorov <lexxua at gmail.com> wrote:

> Greets!
> If we talking about sip it useless. Because it will work only for sip TCP
> or sip TLS . It would not work if proxy in the middle. Don't forget about
> rtp ports.
> On Oct 28, 2015 12:34 AM, "EL" <fs.user at fordior.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','fs.user at fordior.net');>> wrote:
>
>> > Are anyone running FS on port 443 for making such service more
>> available on
>> > public WiFis and such?
>>
>> Configure a VPN on your FS server and make it listen on port 443
>> and register to FS over the VPN. Using a VPN in case of public
>> wifi networks is a win anyway. Bonus: the ISP can't see the voip
>> traffic.
>>
>> --
>> EL
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','consulting at freeswitch.org');>
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org');>
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20151028/679fc301/attachment-0001.html