[Freeswitch-users] High Availability for Webrtc/DTLS ?

[Michael Jerris]

I believe so, yes.

On Friday, June 5, 2015, Sharath Kumar <Sharath.Kumar at mezocliq.com> wrote:

>  Okay I will and let you know. So when you say a new media session, will
> you do a fresh offer-answer with the far end ?
>
>
>
> *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org');>
> [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org');>]
> *On Behalf Of *Michael Jerris
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:34 PM
> *To:* FreeSWITCH Users Help
> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] High Availability for Webrtc/DTLS ?
>
>
>
> I've never tested it, but when we recover we are really establishing a new
> media session, so it likely works.  Give it a try.
>
> On Thursday, June 4, 2015, Sharath Kumar <Sharath.Kumar at mezocliq.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Sharath.Kumar at mezocliq.com');>> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>
>
> I am using Freeswitch for terminating DTLS traffic while the
> webrtc/websocket is terminated by a Kamailio front-ending the FS.
>
> Assuming I have HA configured as given here
> https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/High+Availability
>
> Can I successfully recover calls on the secondary using ‘sofia recover’
> when the primary crashes ?
>
> My gut feel is it won’t work since the DTLS context probably needs to be
> sent to the secondary as well ? Perhaps the secondary needs to do a new
> offer-anwer and regneg DTLS ?
>
>
>
> Thoughts? I am going to try this anyway but if someone knows it will save
> me a ton of time.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sharath
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150605/27a9d7e3/attachment-0001.html