[Freeswitch-users] Re- BT SIP Testing require FreeSWITCH main developer's statement of compliance

William King william.king at quentustech.com
Mon Aug 3 22:50:22 MSD 2015


Have you had a chance to email consulting at freeswitch.org? I've seen a
few large organizations require certifications like this, so it might be
interesting to look into a two way certification process.

At least one of these requirements have to do with the hardware more so
than FS itself.

William King
Senior Engineer
Quentus Technologies, INC
1037 NE 65th St Suite 273
Seattle, WA 98115
Main:   (877) 211-9337
Office: (206) 388-4772
Cell:   (253) 686-5518
william.king at quentustech.com

On 8/3/15 7:26 AM, Andrew Keil wrote:
> I guess this is targeted at Anthony, however Brian or Michael may also
> be able to answer these.
> 
>  
> 
> I am currently undertaking BT’s SIP compliance testing on behalf of my
> client in the UK (on the latest production release of FreeSWITCH 1.4.20)
> and BT have requested the following off the software supplier (which
> could also be in the form of documentation, however if you simply state
> “Yes” for each of these then that should be enough):
> 
>  
> 
> 1)      RFC 3261 compliance
> 
> a.       I have already pointed BT to
> https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/Specifications
> 
> 2)      RFC 3550 compliance
> 
> 3)      RTP clock-source accuracy (RTP clock sources shall be accurate
> to within 66ppm (ie. Shall not drift from a stratum 0 clock source by
> more than 20ms over the course of a 3 minute call)
> 
> 4)      When calculating the jitter estimate to be sent in a receiver
> report the variable holding this data shall be initialised to zero
> before the first incoming RTP packet is processed (i.e. the “s->jitter”
> variable in RFC 3550 [8] Appendix A.8)
> 
> 5)      RFC 2833 compliance
> 
> a.       I have already pointed BT to
> https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/Specifications
> 
> 6)      RFC 4028 keep-alive timer compliant
> 
> 7)      Feature support:
> 
> a.       Call-hold reject
> 
> b.      RFC 3264 compliance
> 
> c.       Call-hold black-holing
> 
> 8)      G.711 Packet Loss Concealment (as described in G.711 Appendix I)
> 
>  
> 
> Like I said above BT are just looking for a statement to say these are
> supported inside FreeSWITCH from the developers of FreeSWITCH.  That is
> why a simple “yes” will suffice.
> 
>  
> 
> One idea is to perhaps add all of these (the ones that are missing) to
> the https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/Specifications
> page.  Just an idea.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
>  
> 
> Andrew Keil
> 
> *Visytel Pty Ltd*
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: 
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
> 
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
> 
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> 



Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list