[Freeswitch-users] Shared registration
kamil.nigmatullin at gmail.com
Mon Oct 27 19:51:15 MSK 2014
imho this is quite a strange scheme. Why not to keep all registrations on
Kamailio? Register should be used in front of users.
2014-10-20 14:43 GMT+06:00 Volkan Oransoy <voransoy at gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
> I have two FS boxes that share same database. These two boxes are behind
> two kamailio sip proxies. When a sip proxy receives a successful
> registration, it replicates the registration to one of FS boxes with a path
> variable. The FS box that receives registration writes this data to
> database. Everything goes well at this scenario. But when I check,
> registration numbers are inconsistent.
> "sofia status profile internal reg" command shows all the records in the
> DB and matches at two FS boxes. But "show registrations" shows less than
> half of these records and numbbers are different at two FS boxes. I think
> that's why some users get UNALLOCATED_NUMBER error when they receive a call
> from opposite FS box.
> Is there anything that I miss at this setup? Or what is the common setup
> for such a cluster?
> /Volkan Oransoy
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
mob: 7 (707) 2517003
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users