[Freeswitch-users] Strange "timer_test" result

Stephen Wilde wstephen80 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 27 20:34:38 MSD 2012


I have tried to use mod_posix_timer but with this timer I had some FS
crashes (segmentation fault) with core dump so I'm moved back to soft
timers.

Stephen

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Christopher Rienzo <cmrienzo at gmail.com>wrote:

> You can also try mod_posix_timer if you have it built.  My CentOS 5.4
> server performs better under load using it with heavy-timer vs using the
> default timer.
>
> "timer_test 20 50 posix"
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Stephen Wilde <wstephen80 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'll try disabling the nanosleep.
>>
>> In server.2 the current load of the box is 35% and after FreeSwitch (at
>> 750% of cpu), in top there is Sangoma Transcoding server (4% of cpu).
>>
>>
>> The result of "timer_test 20 50" is:
>>
>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/18756
>>
>>
>> Here the result of "timer_test 10 50" :
>>
>> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/18757
>>
>> It's normal that only the timer_test on 20 is bad where 10ms is good and
>> also is good 40,60,120?:
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20120327/b156a4c9/attachment.html 


Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list