[Freeswitch-users] Strange "timer_test" result

[Christopher Rienzo]

You can also try mod_posix_timer if you have it built.  My CentOS 5.4
server performs better under load using it with heavy-timer vs using the
default timer.

"timer_test 20 50 posix"



On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Stephen Wilde <wstephen80 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Ok, I'll try disabling the nanosleep.
>
> In server.2 the current load of the box is 35% and after FreeSwitch (at
> 750% of cpu), in top there is Sangoma Transcoding server (4% of cpu).
>
>
> The result of "timer_test 20 50" is:
>
> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/18756
>
>
> Here the result of "timer_test 10 50" :
>
> http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/18757
>
> It's normal that only the timer_test on 20 is bad where 10ms is good and
> also is good 40,60,120?:
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20120327/6db66183/attachment.html