[Freeswitch-users] ipv6 - any fans?
curriegrad2004 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 24 07:04:17 MSD 2012
Sadly a lot of places imply that Nat provides some form of security when it
really wasn't meant for that usage.
On Aug 23, 2012 5:36 PM, "Jason White" <jason at jasonjgw.net> wrote:
> Andrew Cassidy <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org> wrote:
> >I'm all for IPv6, just get your firewalling right, depending on your OS it
> >doesn't always share rules automatically. Don't forget your machine will
> >usually have at least 3 addresses too, which can of course be bound and
> >firewalled individually.
> If you need a firewall, then you do indeed have to make sure that it's
> configured appropriately for both IPv4 and IPv6. There are lazy/uninformed
> administrators who think they can rely on NAT as a substitute for a
> I have native IPv6 access via my ISP and FreeSWITCH works well with it. I
> also used FreeSWITCH over IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnels with surprisingly good
> reliability, but in recent years with the native IPv6 this hasn't been
> necessary except occasionally with a laptop on an IPv4-only network.
> Deployment in a home office environment was easy enough, except initially
> the DHCPv6 prefix delegation and routing over the ppp connection to the
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users