[Freeswitch-users] Implications of using -nonat
curriegrad2004 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 5 21:18:28 MSD 2012
I've submitted a patch for that :P
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bzzz <lazyvirus at gmx.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:41:32 -0700
> curriegrad2004 <curriegrad2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There aren't any implications. The -nonat switch just simply tells
>> FreeSWITCH to discover for an UPnP enabled NAT gateway so it can
>> forward ports dynamically via that API. If you choose to open up
>> ports the manual way then having that -nonat switch enabled
>> doesn't make much of a difference.
> My bad: too much time w/o touching FS (but very bad name too,
> noupnpnat would have been a lot more logical:(
> <Strasph> If I die in 5 minutes, what do you wanna tell me ?
> <Decibel> "What's your root password?"
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users