[Freeswitch-users] Implications of using -nonat
lazyvirus at gmx.com
Sun Aug 5 20:56:07 MSD 2012
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:41:32 -0700
curriegrad2004 <curriegrad2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
> There aren't any implications. The -nonat switch just simply tells
> FreeSWITCH to discover for an UPnP enabled NAT gateway so it can
> forward ports dynamically via that API. If you choose to open up
> ports the manual way then having that -nonat switch enabled
> doesn't make much of a difference.
My bad: too much time w/o touching FS (but very bad name too,
noupnpnat would have been a lot more logical:(
<Strasph> If I die in 5 minutes, what do you wanna tell me ?
<Decibel> "What's your root password?"
Join us at ClueCon 2011 Aug 9-11, 2011
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users