[Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH-users Digest, Vol 50, Issue 28
Gustavo Espeche
gustavo.espeche at upper-soft.com
Fri Aug 6 05:03:21 PDT 2010
Hi i'm suggest debian lenny, and connect to a database through mod_cul,
we reach excellent result with this combination.
Regards.
Gustavo Espeche
www.easyipcall.com
EasyTrade Billing/Routing
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 01:22 -0700,
freeswitch-users-request at lists.freeswitch.org wrote:
> Send FreeSWITCH-users mailing list submissions to
> freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> freeswitch-users-request at lists.freeswitch.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> freeswitch-users-owner at lists.freeswitch.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of FreeSWITCH-users digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Different versions, different cpu load
> (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum)
> 2. Re: Different versions, different cpu load
> (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum)
> 3. Re: Different versions, different cpu load
> (Juan Antonio Iba?ez Santorum)
> 4. Re: Different versions, different cpu load (Seven Du)
> MHTML Document attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
> > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> > <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu
> > load
> > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:33:22 +0200
> >
> > Which distro do you sugest?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > 2010/8/5 Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org>
> > Ubuntu is a common theme when someone says "OMG IT USES ALL
> > MY CPU!"
> >
> >
> > /b
> >
> > On Aug 5, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
> >
> > > ubunto is a nice linux distrib for audio station, not
> > > servers...
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian West" <brian at freeswitch.org>
> > > To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help"
> > > <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:50 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions,
> > > different cpu load
> > >
> > >
> > > > Or stop using ubuntu.
> > > >
> > > > /b
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
> MHTML Document attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
> > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> > <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu
> > load
> > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:36:28 +0200
> >
> > I've got about 75% decrease in performarce. I am using same server
> > and same config. DB was already in ramdisk as svn version so I don't
> > find an explanation for it...
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > 2010/8/5 Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch at gmail.com>
> > My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a
> > 25%
> > performance drop between the old SVN version I was running
> > and the new
> > GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported
> > performance
> > drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to
> > 25%. I am
> > unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a
> > ramdisk, so
> > the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have
> > the db on
> > a ramdisk.
> >
> > 2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
> > <juanito1982 at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > No one experiment this same issue?
> > >
> > > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
> > <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> Hello!
> > >>
> > >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version
> > downloaded some weeks
> > >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has
> > some problems with
> > >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version
> > (FreeSWITCH Version
> > >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that
> > seems to solve this
> > >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing
> > with svn version.
> > >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU
> > load into a dual
> > >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this
> > 75% cpu. I can see
> > >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in
> > git version) and
> > >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now
> > it uses more cpu
> > >> than before. Any idea?
> > >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip
> > provider.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >
> > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > >
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > >
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > > http://www.freeswitch.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Eliot Gable
> >
> > "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow
> > it from our
> > children." ~David Brower
> >
> > "I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not
> > borrowing
> > from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not
> > even
> > considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
> >
> > "Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst
> > eat to
> > live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> MHTML Document attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
> > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> > <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu
> > load
> > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:39:43 +0200
> >
> > I thinkg it is very difficult to find it without a good knowledge of
> > FS internals. Do you know if there is any way to make a profiling
> > which could help?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > 2010/8/5 Rupa Schomaker <rupa at rupa.com>
> > sounds like a good opportunity to try git-bisect to locate
> > where the performance change occurs.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Eliot Gable <egable
> > +freeswitch at gmail.com> wrote:
> > My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago
> > showed a 25%
> > performance drop between the old SVN version I was
> > running and the new
> > GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your
> > reported performance
> > drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it
> > went to 25%. I am
> > unsure of whether my initial testing was using the
> > db on a ramdisk, so
> > the drop could be higher if my previous testing did
> > not have the db on
> > a ramdisk.
> >
> > 2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
> > <juanito1982 at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > No one experiment this same issue?
> > >
> > > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibañez Santorum
> > <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> Hello!
> > >>
> > >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version
> > downloaded some weeks
> > >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but
> > it has some problems with
> > >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git
> > version (FreeSWITCH Version
> > >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400))
> > that seems to solve this
> > >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load
> > comparing with svn version.
> > >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a
> > 75% CPU load into a dual
> > >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls
> > consume this 75% cpu. I can see
> > >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module
> > needed in git version) and
> > >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find
> > why now it uses more cpu
> > >> than before. Any idea?
> > >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an
> > external sip provider.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >
> > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > >
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > >
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > > http://www.freeswitch.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Eliot Gable
> >
> > "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we
> > borrow it from our
> > children." ~David Brower
> >
> > "I decided the words were too conservative for me.
> > We're not borrowing
> > from our children, we're stealing from them--and
> > it's not even
> > considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
> >
> > "Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou
> > shouldst eat to
> > live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Rupa
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> >
> >
> MHTML Document attachment
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Seven Du <dujinfang at gmail.com>
> > Reply-to: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> > <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Different versions, different cpu
> > load
> > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:22:10 +0800
> >
> > Were both of your kernel running on 1000HZ ?
> >
> > 2010/8/6 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>:
> > > I've got about 75% decrease in performarce. I am using same server and same
> > > config. DB was already in ramdisk as svn version so I don't find an
> > > explanation for it...
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > 2010/8/5 Eliot Gable <egable+freeswitch at gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> My most recent testing as of about two weeks ago showed a 25%
> > >> performance drop between the old SVN version I was running and the new
> > >> GIT version. Initially, it seemed closer to your reported performance
> > >> drop, but after moving the database to a ramdisk, it went to 25%. I am
> > >> unsure of whether my initial testing was using the db on a ramdisk, so
> > >> the drop could be higher if my previous testing did not have the db on
> > >> a ramdisk.
> > >>
> > >> 2010/8/3 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>:
> > >> > No one experiment this same issue?
> > >> >
> > >> > I also noticed a high cpu consume on call hangup.
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards
> > >> >
> > >> > 2010/8/2 Juan Antonio Ibaez Santorum <juanito1982 at gmail.com>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hello!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I was been some test using one FS tarball version downloaded some weeks
> > >> >> ago (FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.6 (svn-exported)) but it has some problems
> > >> >> with
> > >> >> odbc connections managemens. Now I'm using a git version (FreeSWITCH
> > >> >> Version
> > >> >> 1.0.head (git-b485f25 2010-07-30 19-46-05 -0400)) that seems to solve
> > >> >> this
> > >> >> problem but I noticed it has a high cpu load comparing with svn
> > >> >> version.
> > >> >> While I could manage more than 200 calls with a 75% CPU load into a
> > >> >> dual
> > >> >> core server using svn version, now, 50 calls consume this 75% cpu. I
> > >> >> can see
> > >> >> same modules are loaded (except new hash module needed in git version)
> > >> >> and
> > >> >> same scenario is used. I am not be able to find why now it uses more
> > >> >> cpu
> > >> >> than before. Any idea?
> > >> >> Each testing call is a simple bridge to an external sip provider.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Regards
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > >> > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > >> > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > >> > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > >> > http://www.freeswitch.org
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Eliot Gable
> > >>
> > >> "We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors: we borrow it from our
> > >> children." ~David Brower
> > >>
> > >> "I decided the words were too conservative for me. We're not borrowing
> > >> from our children, we're stealing from them--and it's not even
> > >> considered to be a crime." ~David Brower
> > >>
> > >> "Esse oportet ut vivas, non vivere ut edas." (Thou shouldst eat to
> > >> live; not live to eat.) ~Marcus Tullius Cicero
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > >> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > >> http://www.freeswitch.org
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> > > FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> > > http://www.freeswitch.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list