[Freeswitch-users] FS in Amazon EC2 for production?

Erik Wickstrom erik at erikwickstrom.com
Wed May 27 09:18:45 PDT 2009


It's been under pretty light use.  About 20 users.  A bunch of DIDs coming
in and some outbound campaigns.  A couple hundred calls a day. (we also did
a test for an outbound campaign with 8 telemarketers making 1000s of calls
in a day -- worked great!)

The AMI is based on Ubuntu 8.04.  We're using the smallest instance at this
point, so it's $70/mo + bandwidth/storage ~~ maybe $80/mo.

The loadavg is always at 0.00.

Erik

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi <
raffaele.p.guidi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Wow, that's cool. Can you give us some figures? How many users/calls per
> day, what is the AMI setup, an average cost per month? Do you think it would
> be a feasible solution for a call center?
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 18:21, Erik Wickstrom <erik at erikwickstrom.com>wrote:
>
>> I've been running a production FS app on EC2 since December.  It's been
>> really stable.  Same server/instance since day1.  We've haven't had any
>> complaints....
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Kristian Kielhofner <
>> kristian.kielhofner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Not with FreeSWITCH in our testing.  Now if you have stupid defaults
>>> > in your virtualization env. it might act funny but I have run FS on
>>> > EC2 without a problem.
>>> >
>>> > /b
>>>
>>> Hey Brian,
>>>
>>>  FreeSWITCH in EC2 is a bit of a mystery to me...
>>>
>>>  Call me old fashioned but in my mind VoIP and geography are linked
>>> in %99 of scenarios.  Having VoIP services in a pure "cloud"
>>> environment just doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
>>>
>>>  Consider a "hosted" environment with clients registered to a
>>> FreeSWITCH server.  One day your instance is physically running on
>>> hardware in Seattle.  The next day it could (potentially) be running
>>> in Chicago.  That's obviously a very different routing path for your
>>> clients.  Even /if/ Amazon (or whomever) employs every routing/network
>>> trick in the book you still won't be able to get over that change in
>>> geography.
>>>
>>>  It's certainly possible a change like this may very well never
>>> happen in practice.  I wouldn't know; I've never used EC2 and I don't
>>> even know that much about it.  I'm just curious how well strictly,
>>> practically speaking this will work in the long term.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kristian Kielhofner
>>> http://www.astlinux.org
>>> http://blog.krisk.org
>>> http://www.star2star.com
>>> http://www.submityoursip.com
>>> http://www.voalte.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeswitch-users mailing list
>> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20090527/cd7c3a6c/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list