[Freeswitch-users] FS doesn't update rtp port when sip UPDATE message changed the rtp port

[Michael Jerris]

There is no such thing as freeswitch 1.5.  Have you tried latest svn  
trunk to see if this behavior is the same?

Mike

On Dec 23, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Lei Tang <lei.tlfly at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all, I'm using  FS 1.5,  doesn't somebody known something about  
> this problem?
> My scenario is :
> A(FreeSwitch)                      B
>       ------INVITE ------->
>       <----100 Tring--------
>       <----180 Ring --------   with sdp m=audio 55066 RTP/AVP 0 120   
> c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
>       <----UPDATE -------    with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120   
> c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
>       -----200 OK  ------>     response for UPDATE message
>       <---- 200 OK--------     response for INVITE message,  with  
> sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120  c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
>       --------ACK --------->
> The problem is, B changed the rtp port in UPDATE message and "200  
> OK" response message, but FS didn't do update , so it still send and  
> receive data from port 55066.
> Is this a bug in FS? Does someone known something about this  
> problem?   Any advice is appreciated!
> -- 
> Lei.Tang
> lei.tlfly at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- 
> users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20091223/6f87a4e2/attachment-0002.html