<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>There is no such thing as freeswitch 1.5. Have you tried latest svn trunk to see if this behavior is the same?</div><div><br></div><div>Mike<br><br>On Dec 23, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Lei Tang <<a href="mailto:lei.tlfly@gmail.com">lei.tlfly@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Hi all, I'm using FS 1.5, doesn't somebody known something about this problem?<br>My scenario is :<br>A(FreeSwitch) B<br> ------INVITE -------> <br clear="all"> <----100 Tring--------<br>
<----180 Ring -------- with sdp m=audio 55066 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76<br> <----UPDATE ------- with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76<br> -----200 OK ------> response for UPDATE message<br>
<---- 200 OK-------- response for INVITE message, with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76<br> --------ACK ---------><br>The problem is, B changed the rtp port in UPDATE message and "200 OK" response message, but FS didn't do update , so it still send and receive data from port 55066. <br>
Is this a bug in FS? Does someone known something about this problem? Any advice is appreciated! <br>-- <br>Lei.Tang<br><a href="mailto:lei.tlfly@gmail.com" target="_blank"><a href="mailto:lei.tlfly@gmail.com">lei.tlfly@gmail.com</a></a><br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>FreeSWITCH-users mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a></span><br><span>UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</span><br><span><a href="http://www.freeswitch.org">http://www.freeswitch.org</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>