[Freeswitch-users] Complete seperation of VOIP app from FS
eakarsu_33 at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 1 06:24:14 PDT 2008
Thanks for your clarification.
Here we have to write all these commands to send to FS remotely.
Do we have any high-level API that we can use to send command to FS and parse the results?
----- Original Message ----
From: David Knell <dave at 3c.co.uk>
To: freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 12:19:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Complete seperation of VOIP app from FS
A dialplan extension like this:
<condition field="destination_number" expression="^0">
<action application="socket" data="127.0.0.1:6100 async full" />
results in all calls to numbers starting with 0 being handled by a
server on localhost
listening on port 6100. That server has full control over the call.
Change the IP
address to run the server on a different host.
> Still searching event_socket module.
> If we set up dialplan, all received calls will routed based on dialplan rules.
> But at the same time, if there is remote process connected to FS through socket_module, dialplan or remotes process will have priority to control FS behavior. Can remote process interfere dialplan rules.?
> Is it possible to define a dialplan so that one extension will be routed to a remote process and other extension will be routed to different process?
> I am thinking to abstract out IVR or any VOIP application from FS box completely and to run application on different host or process.
> Erol Akarsu
> Freeswitch-users mailing list
> Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
David Knell, Director, 3C Limited
T: 020 8114 8901 F: 020 3002 7257 M: 001 415 630 3031
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users