Re: [Freeswitch-users] Diff between the transfer and bridge application?I run freeswitch in the multi domain mode. I am getting complaints about cross domain calls. For example, a DID should go to ext 21@xxx1.voice2net.ca and it does but it also goes to 21@xxx2.voice2net.ca My dial plan bridges as follows; <action application="bridge" data="{sip_invite_domain=xxx1.voice2net.ca,presence_id=21@xxx1.voice2net.ca}user/21@xxx1.voice2net.ca"/> Registrations are fine and most calling works perfectly, but I get this a few times a day. I commented out the following to support multiple domains <!--all inbound reg will look in this domain for the users --> <!--<param name="force-register-domain" value="$${domain}"/>--> <!--force the domain in subscriptions to this value --> <!--<param name="force-subscription-domain" value="$${domain}"/>--> <!--all inbound reg will stored in the db using this domain --> <!--<param name="force-register-db-domain" value="$${domain}"/>--> Any thoughts?? Darcy Primrose

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Diff between the transfer and bridge application?Thanks for clearing that out. /Fred From: Ken Rice Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 4:35 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Diff between the transfer and bridge application? Transfer is used to restart the dialplan processing with the data provided... Application=”transfer” data=”extension DIALPLAN context” where extension is the same as “destination_number” field for the dialplan conditions... The XML in your example refers to XML dialplan, this could be a different dialplan module such as ENUM... The context is the dialplan context ie: default or public in the example configs... Bridge sends the call to an endpoint.. User/1001 is a special endpoint processor that translates via the user director to a bridge string of where that user is registered... On 1/17/14 5:09 AM, "Fredrik Åhlén" <wlmailhtml:fredrik.h.ahlen@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I am playing around with my demo installation of FreeSwitch and have a question regarding dialplans and dialplan applications. I’ve looked in the wiki but I am not sure of the practical differens between the transfer and bridge application? For example, you can “route” an inbound call to extension 1001 with both these configs: 1. <action application="transfer" data="1001 XML default"/> 2. <action application="bridge" data="user/1001"/> Is the only diff that the transfer application executes the dialplan for the new extension but not in the bride case? With Best Regards, Fred ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: wlmailhtml:consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list wlmailhtml:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- Ken http://www.FreeSWITCH.org http://www.ClueCon.com http://www.OSTAG.org irc.freenode.net #freeswitch Twitter: @FreeSWITCH -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org