All my remote extensions are showing port number 5090, except the extension 2013. Why does it show port 56588 ? Call-ID: OTJlMGM3NWY4OTAyMDIwODEwODMwYjM5N2UyYjBiZGU. User: 2013@henkoegema.ftpaccess.cc Contact: "Simon" <sip:2013@xx.205.1.28:56588;rinstance=defd850666661ca9> Agent: Zoiper for Windows rev.599 Status: Registered(UDP)(unknown) EXP(2008-11-13 11:59:51) Host: freeswitch Henk. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Strange-%28-%29-port-number.-tp20478756p20478756.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Because thats the contact's port number. /b On Nov 13, 2008, at 5:09 AM, henkoegema wrote:
All my remote extensions are showing port number 5090, except the extension 2013. Why does it show port 56588 ?
Call-ID: OTJlMGM3NWY4OTAyMDIwODEwODMwYjM5N2UyYjBiZGU. User: 2013@henkoegema.ftpaccess.cc Contact: "Simon" <sip:2013@xx.205.1.28:56588;rinstance=defd850666661ca9
Agent: Zoiper for Windows rev.599 Status: Registered(UDP)(unknown) EXP(2008-11-13 11:59:51) Host: freeswitch
Henk.
Brian West-3 wrote:
Because thats the contact's port number.
But I programmed port 5090. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Strange-%28-%29-port-number.-tp20478756p20479337.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you tell FS to use Port 5090 then FS will be contacted through port 5090. But ports are not always symmetrical on both sides. The UA (e.g. Zoiper) will use an available port on his side, that can be 5060 but often is 2051 or even a higher port. Imagine, you may have several local phones with private Ip registered in your company under one external IP. It is then clear, that each phone has to use it's own port to be contacted from external. Best regards Peter henkoegema schrieb:
Brian West-3 wrote:
Because thats the contact's port number.
But I programmed port 5090.
participants (3)
-
Brian West
-
henkoegema
-
Peter P GMX