It might be some nat alg stuff confusing the legs coming from the same phone. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jerry Richards <jerry.richards@teotech.com>wrote:

Hi All, I am seeing an issue where Freeswitch is disconnecting a call when one endpoint tries to put the call on-hold (inbound-bypass-media is true and one phone has a secondary extension of the other phone). I'm just wondering if there is a rule/restriction for bypass media I'm not aware of.

If I change the configuration to inbound-proxy-media true then the call is put on-hold correctly. If I set it back to inbound-bypass-media true and then remove the secondary extension from Phone A (below), then the call is put on-hold correctly.

Here is the scenario: 1) Phone A registers primary extension 1002 and secondary extension 1003 2) Phone B registers only primary extension 1003 3) A calls B 4) B answers 5) A holds call 6) Freeswitch sends BYE to both A and B with reason DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER (Also it says: "Re-INVITE to a no-media channel that is not in a bridge")

Thanks, Jerry

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org

-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900