It might be some nat alg stuff confusing the legs coming from the same phone.


On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jerry Richards <jerry.richards@teotech.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I am seeing an issue where Freeswitch is disconnecting a call when one endpoint tries to put the call on-hold (inbound-bypass-media is true and one phone has a secondary extension of the other phone).  I'm just wondering if there is a rule/restriction for bypass media I'm not aware of.
 
If I change the configuration to inbound-proxy-media true then the call is put on-hold correctly.  If I set it back to inbound-bypass-media true and then remove the secondary extension from Phone A (below), then the call is put on-hold correctly.
 
Here is the scenario:
1) Phone A registers primary extension 1002 and secondary extension 1003
2) Phone B registers only primary extension 1003
3) A calls B
4) B answers
5) A holds call
6) Freeswitch sends BYE to both A and B with reason DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER
   (Also it says: "Re-INVITE to a no-media channel that is not in a bridge")
 
Thanks,
Jerry
 
 


FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org
googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:+19193869900