FS doesn't update rtp port when sip UPDATE message changed the rtp port
Hi all, I'm using FS 1.5, doesn't somebody known something about this problem? My scenario is : A(FreeSwitch) B ------INVITE -------> <----100 Tring-------- <----180 Ring -------- with sdp m=audio 55066 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 <----UPDATE ------- with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 -----200 OK ------> response for UPDATE message <---- 200 OK-------- response for INVITE message, with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 --------ACK ---------> The problem is, B changed the rtp port in UPDATE message and "200 OK" response message, but FS didn't do update , so it still send and receive data from port 55066. Is this a bug in FS? Does someone known something about this problem? Any advice is appreciated! -- Lei.Tang lei.tlfly@gmail.com
There is no such thing as freeswitch 1.5. Have you tried latest svn trunk to see if this behavior is the same? Mike On Dec 23, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Lei Tang <lei.tlfly@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, I'm using FS 1.5, doesn't somebody known something about this problem? My scenario is : A(FreeSwitch) B ------INVITE -------> <----100 Tring-------- <----180 Ring -------- with sdp m=audio 55066 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 <----UPDATE ------- with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 -----200 OK ------> response for UPDATE message <---- 200 OK-------- response for INVITE message, with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 --------ACK ---------> The problem is, B changed the rtp port in UPDATE message and "200 OK" response message, but FS didn't do update , so it still send and receive data from port 55066. Is this a bug in FS? Does someone known something about this problem? Any advice is appreciated! -- Lei.Tang lei.tlfly@gmail.com _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- users http://www.freeswitch.org
Thanks Michael, sorry for my mistake, I'm using FS 1.0.5pre9, I'll try the lastest svn trunk. 2009/12/23 Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com>
There is no such thing as freeswitch 1.5. Have you tried latest svn trunk to see if this behavior is the same?
Mike
On Dec 23, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Lei Tang <lei.tlfly@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, I'm using FS 1.5, doesn't somebody known something about this problem? My scenario is : A(FreeSwitch) B ------INVITE -------> <----100 Tring-------- <----180 Ring -------- with sdp m=audio 55066 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 <----UPDATE ------- with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 -----200 OK ------> response for UPDATE message <---- 200 OK-------- response for INVITE message, with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76 --------ACK ---------> The problem is, B changed the rtp port in UPDATE message and "200 OK" response message, but FS didn't do update , so it still send and receive data from port 55066. Is this a bug in FS? Does someone known something about this problem? Any advice is appreciated! -- Lei.Tang <lei.tlfly@gmail.com>lei.tlfly@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Lei.Tang lei.tlfly@gmail.com
participants (2)
-
Lei Tang
-
Michael Jerris