Thanks Michael, sorry for my mistake, I'm using FS 1.0.5pre9, I'll try the lastest svn trunk.
There is no such thing as freeswitch 1.5. Have you tried latest svn trunk to see if this behavior is the same?MikeHi all, I'm using FS 1.5, doesn't somebody known something about this problem?
My scenario is :
A(FreeSwitch) B
------INVITE ------->
<----100 Tring--------
<----180 Ring -------- with sdp m=audio 55066 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
<----UPDATE ------- with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
-----200 OK ------> response for UPDATE message
<---- 200 OK-------- response for INVITE message, with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
--------ACK --------->
The problem is, B changed the rtp port in UPDATE message and "200 OK" response message, but FS didn't do update , so it still send and receive data from port 55066.
Is this a bug in FS? Does someone known something about this problem? Any advice is appreciated!
--
Lei.Tang
lei.tlfly@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org