mod_sms delivery failure
Hi everyone, I've been trying to determine if a message was successfully delivered to a device. Stumbled on a post from February (subject: Testing mod_sms) http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2012-February/005619.ht...: ________________________________ From: Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com> To: Warren Lin <wlin121443 at yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Testing mod_sms hi you can find out how to use the lists at http://lists.freeswitch.org try latest GIT, i put in a patch to fire the events with the heder Failed-Delivery true if you are listening for MESSAGE events you should catch them. ________________________________ I can't find any reference to Failed-Delivery in mod_sms.c neither anywhere else in the source tree. There is a field called Delivery-Failure, but seems to be used by other modules to indicate a failure on the response going out of freeswitch, not to freeswitch. Was this overwritten / rolled back at some point ? thanks -- lucas
If the sms delivery failed you will see an event with the type of SMS_MESSAGE and there will be a header 'delivery-failure' with a value of 'true'. I'm working on a patch that will enable the event on successful delivery. William King Senior Engineer Quentus Technologies, INC 1037 NE 65th St Suite 273 Seattle, WA 98115 Main: (877) 211-9337 Office: (206) 388-4772 Cell: (253) 686-5518 william.king@quentustech.com On 11/01/2012 10:38 AM, Lucas Fontes wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to determine if a message was successfully delivered to a device. Stumbled on a post from February (subject: Testing mod_sms) http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2012-February/005619.ht...:
________________________________ From: Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev>> To: Warren Lin <wlin121443 at yahoo.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Testing mod_sms
hi you can find out how to use the lists at http://lists.freeswitch.org
try latest GIT, i put in a patch to fire the events with the heder Failed-Delivery true if you are listening for MESSAGE events you should catch them.
________________________________
I can't find any reference to Failed-Delivery in mod_sms.c neither anywhere else in the source tree. There is a field called Delivery-Failure, but seems to be used by other modules to indicate a failure on the response going out of freeswitch, not to freeswitch. Was this overwritten / rolled back at some point ?
thanks
-- lucas
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Thanks William, I've tried with 1.3.0+git~20121016T230329Z~c51aebf621 and did not see that event even after all timers expired. Is this event generated by mod_sms or gsmopen ? Reason I ask is because my use case is around SIP messages only and we want to track delivery to devices. Ex: client connected via eventsocket -> sendevent SMS::SEND_MESSAGE Freeswitch consuming SMS::SEND_MESSAGE -> dispatch SIP message to client device client returning anything other than 200 OK -> fire MESSAGE event tagged as failure If that's the same understanding, then I will dig further here as I'm probably not catching such event (although pretty sure it is subscribed to all events right now). cheers -- lucas On 2012-11-01, at 5:31 PM, William King <william.king@quentustech.com> wrote:
If the sms delivery failed you will see an event with the type of SMS_MESSAGE and there will be a header 'delivery-failure' with a value of 'true'. I'm working on a patch that will enable the event on successful delivery.
William King Senior Engineer Quentus Technologies, INC 1037 NE 65th St Suite 273 Seattle, WA 98115 Main: (877) 211-9337 Office: (206) 388-4772 Cell: (253) 686-5518 william.king@quentustech.com
On 11/01/2012 10:38 AM, Lucas Fontes wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to determine if a message was successfully delivered to a device. Stumbled on a post from February (subject: Testing mod_sms) http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2012-February/005619.ht...:
________________________________ From: Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev>> To: Warren Lin <wlin121443 at yahoo.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Testing mod_sms
hi you can find out how to use the lists at http://lists.freeswitch.org
try latest GIT, i put in a patch to fire the events with the heder Failed-Delivery true if you are listening for MESSAGE events you should catch them.
________________________________
I can't find any reference to Failed-Delivery in mod_sms.c neither anywhere else in the source tree. There is a field called Delivery-Failure, but seems to be used by other modules to indicate a failure on the response going out of freeswitch, not to freeswitch. Was this overwritten / rolled back at some point ?
thanks
-- lucas
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
I don't think SIP MESSAGEs have a response/ack. I know that our provider doesn't send anything except the 200 OK when we send a message, and that doesn't mean it actually made it to the device. As far as I know there is no way to know if and when the device gets the actual message without the device responding with another message back through the via chain. -Chad From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Lucas Fontes Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:38 PM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sms delivery failure Hi everyone, I've been trying to determine if a message was successfully delivered to a device. Stumbled on a post from February (subject: Testing mod_sms) http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2012-February/00561 9.html: ________________________________ From: Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev> > To: Warren Lin <wlin121443 at yahoo.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev> > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Testing mod_sms hi you can find out how to use the lists at http://lists.freeswitch.org try latest GIT, i put in a patch to fire the events with the heder Failed-Delivery true if you are listening for MESSAGE events you should catch them. ________________________________ I can't find any reference to Failed-Delivery in mod_sms.c neither anywhere else in the source tree. There is a field called Delivery-Failure, but seems to be used by other modules to indicate a failure on the response going out of freeswitch, not to freeswitch. Was this overwritten / rolled back at some point ? thanks -- lucas
Hi Chad, thanks for that awesome ESL binding for node.js ! Section 7 of rfc3428
A UAS that receives a MESSAGE request processes it following the rules of SIP [1].
A UAS receiving a MESSAGE request SHOULD respond with a final response immediately. Note, however, that the UAS is not obliged to display the message to the user either before or after responding with a 200 OK. That is, a 200 OK response does not necessarily mean the user has read the message.
A 2xx response to a MESSAGE request MUST NOT contain a body. A UAS MUST NOT insert a Contact header field into a 2xx response.
A UAS which is, in fact, a message relay, storing the message and forwarding it later on, or forwarding it into a non-SIP domain, SHOULD return a 202 (Accepted) [5] response indicating that the message was accepted, but end to end delivery has not been guaranteed.
A 4xx or 5xx response indicates that the message was not delivered successfully. A 6xx response means it was delivered successfully, but refused.
At Fongo (fongo.com) we have a few proxies for store and forward, also for SMS integration. We use 200, 402, 404 and 488 to control delivery and payments. So in our case, the final device always returns 200 (as it is the final), but a proxy in between might generate a 4xx. we have an opensips cluster in front of freeswitch and steer MESSAGE methods away from freeswitch to handle those scenarios. I'm looking into removing this logic from opensips and move it to freeswitch to keep it consistent with dialplan and rating engine. cheers -- lucas On 2012-11-01, at 5:46 PM, Chad Engler <Chad.Engler@patlive.com> wrote:
I don’t think SIP MESSAGEs have a response/ack. I know that our provider doesn’t send anything except the 200 OK when we send a message, and that doesn’t mean it actually made it to the device. As far as I know there is no way to know if and when the device gets the actual message without the device responding with another message back through the via chain.
-Chad
From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Lucas Fontes Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:38 PM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sms delivery failure
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to determine if a message was successfully delivered to a device. Stumbled on a post from February (subject: Testing mod_sms)http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2012-February/005619.ht...:
________________________________ From: Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com> To: Warren Lin <wlin121443 at yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Testing mod_sms
hi you can find out how to use the lists at http://lists.freeswitch.org
try latest GIT, i put in a patch to fire the events with the heder Failed-Delivery true if you are listening for MESSAGE events you should catch them. ________________________________
I can't find any reference to Failed-Delivery in mod_sms.c neither anywhere else in the source tree. There is a field called Delivery-Failure, but seems to be used by other modules to indicate a failure on the response going out of freeswitch, not to freeswitch. Was this overwritten / rolled back at some point ?
thanks
-- lucas
_________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com
Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
No problem! Thanks for using it! I've already got a couple of good pull requests that have been merged in, and a couple other bugs fixed as well. I want to do a little more cleanup, but npm should be seeing a new version this week; so be ready for that! -Chad From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Lucas Fontes Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 7:29 PM To: FreeSWITCH Users Help Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sms delivery failure Hi Chad, thanks for that awesome ESL binding for node.js ! Section 7 of rfc3428 A UAS that receives a MESSAGE request processes it following the rules of SIP [1]. A UAS receiving a MESSAGE request SHOULD respond with a final response immediately. Note, however, that the UAS is not obliged to display the message to the user either before or after responding with a 200 OK. That is, a 200 OK response does not necessarily mean the user has read the message. A 2xx response to a MESSAGE request MUST NOT contain a body. A UAS MUST NOT insert a Contact header field into a 2xx response. A UAS which is, in fact, a message relay, storing the message and forwarding it later on, or forwarding it into a non-SIP domain, SHOULD return a 202 (Accepted) [5] response indicating that the message was accepted, but end to end delivery has not been guaranteed. A 4xx or 5xx response indicates that the message was not delivered successfully. A 6xx response means it was delivered successfully, but refused. At Fongo (fongo.com) we have a few proxies for store and forward, also for SMS integration. We use 200, 402, 404 and 488 to control delivery and payments. So in our case, the final device always returns 200 (as it is the final), but a proxy in between might generate a 4xx. we have an opensips cluster in front of freeswitch and steer MESSAGE methods away from freeswitch to handle those scenarios. I'm looking into removing this logic from opensips and move it to freeswitch to keep it consistent with dialplan and rating engine. cheers -- lucas On 2012-11-01, at 5:46 PM, Chad Engler <Chad.Engler@patlive.com> wrote: I don't think SIP MESSAGEs have a response/ack. I know that our provider doesn't send anything except the 200 OK when we send a message, and that doesn't mean it actually made it to the device. As far as I know there is no way to know if and when the device gets the actual message without the device responding with another message back through the via chain. -Chad From: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Lucas Fontes Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:38 PM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] mod_sms delivery failure Hi everyone, I've been trying to determine if a message was successfully delivered to a device. Stumbled on a post from February (subject: Testing mod_sms)http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2012-Februa ry/005619.html: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2012-February/0056 19.html:> ________________________________ From: Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev> > To: Warren Lin <wlin121443 at yahoo.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev> > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Testing mod_sms hi you can find out how to use the lists at http://lists.freeswitch.org <http://lists.freeswitch.org> try latest GIT, i put in a patch to fire the events with the heder Failed-Delivery true if you are listening for MESSAGE events you should catch them. ________________________________ I can't find any reference to Failed-Delivery in mod_sms.c neither anywhere else in the source tree. There is a field called Delivery-Failure, but seems to be used by other modules to indicate a failure on the response going out of freeswitch, not to freeswitch. Was this overwritten / rolled back at some point ? thanks -- lucas ________________________________________________________________________ _ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org <mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com <http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com> FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com <http://www.cudatel.com> Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org> http://wiki.freeswitch.org <http://wiki.freeswitch.org> http://www.cluecon.com <http://www.cluecon.com> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users> http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org>
This technique has worked on 2G gsm nets. 3G and 4G, it's more carrier selective. For a given message TEXT (not the address#), prefix the msg string with one of either, 111 -or- *noti# E.g. 111Hello World -or- *noti#Hello World (Fido in Canada supports/ed 111, T-Mobile supports/ed *noti#) On 2012-11-01, at 19:49, Chad Engler <Chad.Engler@patlive.com> wrote: I don’t think SIP MESSAGEs have a response/ack. I know that our provider doesn’t send anything except the 200 OK when we send a message, and that doesn’t mean it actually made it to the device. As far as I know there is no way to know if and when the device gets the actual message without the device responding with another message back through the via chain. -Chad *From:* freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Lucas Fontes *Sent:* Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:38 PM *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] mod_sms delivery failure Hi everyone, I've been trying to determine if a message was successfully delivered to a device. Stumbled on a post from February (subject: Testing mod_sms) http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2012-February/005619.ht...: ________________________________ From: Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale at gmail.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev>> To: Warren Lin <wlin121443 at yahoo.com <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Testing mod_sms hi you can find out how to use the lists at http://lists.freeswitch.org try latest GIT, i put in a patch to fire the events with the heder Failed-Delivery true if you are listening for MESSAGE events you should catch them. ________________________________ I can't find any reference to Failed-Delivery in mod_sms.c neither anywhere else in the source tree. There is a field called Delivery-Failure, but seems to be used by other modules to indicate a failure on the response going out of freeswitch, not to freeswitch. Was this overwritten / rolled back at some point ? thanks -- lucas _________________________________________________________________________ Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: consulting@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server http://www.cudatel.com Official FreeSWITCH Sites http://www.freeswitch.org http://wiki.freeswitch.org http://www.cluecon.com FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
participants (4)
-
Chad Engler
-
Lucas Fontes
-
S. Scott
-
William King